Print Page  |  Contact Us  |  Report Abuse  |  Sign In  |  Join ACAM
Rewarding Bad Behavior: Doctors & Compounders Are Being Punished for the FDA's Ineptitude
Share |

Rewarding Bad Behavior:
Doctors and Compounders Are Being Punished for the FDA’s Ineptitude

By Gretchen DuBeau
Executive and Legal Director
Alliance for Natural Health USA

“I certify that this compounded variation produces ‘a significant difference from the marketed drug version.’ ”

If Congress’s initial, knee-jerk reaction to the 2012 New England Compounding Center (NECC) meningitis tragedy had become law, you would have had to add this federally mandated disclaimer to every prescription you wrote for a compounded drug. It seems Congress, influenced by pharmaceutical industry lobbying dollars, wanted to reward the FDA’s failure to shut down grossly negligent compounding manufacturers—but did so by granting the agency vast new powers.

Confused by this logic? Welcome to Washington, DC.

My organization, the Alliance for Natural Health USA (ANH-USA), and our allies eventually defeated the practitioner certification provision. However, it was just another twist in the long, sordid tale of the 2013 Drug Quality and Security Act—legislation that will forever change consumer and practitioner access to compounded medications.

Act I: Documented FDA Inaction Leads to Fifty-three Deaths

In 2002, the FDA began investigating Massachusetts’ NECC after receiving reports that five patients had become ill after receiving its drugs. However, the agency simply gave up its investigation after the NECC’s owner refused to cooperate. Just a few months later, two patients exhibited symptoms of bacterial meningitis after receiving NECC injections.

In 2003, FDA officials suggested the NECC be “prohibited from manufacturing” until it improved its quality and safety controls, as there was very real “potential for serious public consequences.” However, the FDA deferred any real action to the state of Massachusetts.

The FDA inspected the NECC in 2004. Two years later, it issued a warning letter based on violations it found during its inspection. In 2008, FDA received a complaint from its Los Angeles District Office about problems with NECC products. Separately, a New England-based FDA official recommended that the FDA inspect NECC. FDA declined, and instead sent another warning letter.

In the fall of 2012, fourteen thousand patients received NECC spinal injections that were contaminated with fungal meningitis. Over 700 people were sickened; fifty-three die.

Act II: Big Pharma Lobbyists Exploit the NECC Tragedy

ANH-USA’s experience on Capitol Hill has taught us that for special interests, “tragedy” is just another word for “opportunity.”

In the wake of the meningitis outbreak, Big Pharma lobbyists focused the legislative conversation on “problems” with compounding pharmacies and medications. Unfortunately, they found a willing audience: on April 26, 2013, the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) released compounding legislation that rewarded the FDA’s ineptitude and inaction with expanded powers. The bill:

·       Granted the FDA the power to remove most compounded medications from the market—summarily eliminating drugs like bioidentical hormones (estriol) and clearing the way for more expensive patented drugs;

·       Required that doctors add a disclaimer to prescriptions for compounding drugs, which would have placed prescriptions directly under federal scrutiny; and

·       Outlined a standard for compounded drug safety and efficacy that would have required double-blind, random-controlled trials (RCTs)—a standard typically reserved for mass-produced prescription drugs!

Interestingly, that same month, the House Energy and Commerce Committee concluded that the FDA was at fault for the NECC tragedy: “After reviewing more than 27,000 documents, we found a dramatically different picture than the one painted by the FDA…We found that FDA focused on perfecting their legal reasons for inaction instead of protecting families.”

How can one reconcile the stark difference between the conclusion of the Senate investigation (that the FDA had ample power and choose not to act) and the April 2013 legislation (that the FDA needs more powers in order to act)?

Three simple words: Follow. The. Money.

·       Pfizer gave campaign contributions to eight out of the twenty-two members of the HELP Committee.

·       In May 2013, the Working Group on Pharmaceutical Safety went public, revealing one of the most influential behind-the-scenes forces behind the HELP committee’s legislation. WGPS is headed Tommy G. Thompson, former US Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) and current chairman of TherapeuticsMD, a founding member of WGPS.

·       In July 2013, ANH-USA obtained a document in which TherapeuticsMD, pitching itself to potential investors, named compounding pharmacies as competitors in the coveted bioidentical hormone market.

Act III: The Integrative Health Community Strikes Back

Alarmed by how this legislation would affect integrative patients and practitioners, my organization immediately launched a multifaceted grassroots, lobbying, and publicity campaign to amend the most dangerous aspects of the April 2013 compounding bill.

The fruits of our efforts were clearly reflected in the final bill, which was passed in November 2013. The troubling elements of the original legislation that we were able to improve include:

·       Protecting compounded drugs that have USP monographs for traditional pharmacies. This makes it much more likely that medications like estriol will remain available for in-state patients.

·       Ensuring that compounding pharmacies could continue to make non-standardized dosages of drugs, thus maintaining consumer access to individualized dosages.

·       Removing specific language that targeted extended-release products. While the final language still permits the FDA to disallow entire categories of drugs, the specific reference to time-released compounds has been removed.

·       Removing a “safety and efficacy” requirement that could have forced compounders to perform RCTs. RCTs are not only inappropriate for individualized medicine, but are prohibitively expensive (a single RCT comes with a price tag of millions of dollars). This provision was simply a backdoor approach to banning compounded medications.

·       Removing language that would have mandated physician reporting within a few days. This gives doctors more time and flexibility to treat patients as they see fit.

However, many concerns remained. For example, the alarming distinction between traditional compounding pharmacies and outsourcing facilities: traditional pharmacies will only be able to compound drugs that have a USP monograph, are part of an FDA-approved drug, or are on a “pre-approved” FDA list, and will only be able to send 5% of their total prescriptions out of state.

By comparison, outsourcing facilities will be permitted to distribute out of state without restrictions and won’t require individualized prescriptions. However, they will only be able to produce drugs that are on a FDA-approved list (it’s likely this list will be limited).

The full impact of the final bill will not be known or felt until the FDA completes its rulemaking process. However, after carefully analyzing the legislation and speaking with compounders and doctors, we project a number of ramifications:

·       Fewer compounded drugs may be available. Drugs like bioidentical estriol, compounded IV nutrients, desiccated (complete) thyroid medications, and 17P are likely to be banned from outsourcing facilities under new FDA rules.

·       Because traditional pharmacies will be limited in how many drugs they can compound for out-of-state patients, and doctors will be less able to order drugs for office use in advance, patients may have to wait longer for the drugs they need.

·       Thanks to the regulatory favoritism of outsourcing facilities over traditional pharmacies, more doctors will be forced to use large outsourcing facilities. This may spark the closure of many small-scale, traditional compounding pharmacies.

·       Doctors are reporting that they’ve already been directed to outsourcing facilities and have been told by traditional pharmacies that their orders can’t be filled. It seems traditional compounders are hesitant to fill prescriptions out of fear of FDA reprisal and are hesitant to act without finalized regulations.

Act IV: What You Can Do to Protect Your Rights

The new compounding law is now in the regulatory phase, which means the FDA is translating it into regulations for doctors and pharmacies. It’s critical that the integrative health community take action to influence the new FDA rules and protect consumer access to compounded medications.

You can act by visiting www.ANH-USA.org/compoundingproblem. Here you’ll find a quick and easy way to send the FDA and Congress a message about how the rules will affect your access to vital compounded medicines. Please encourage your patients to act as well!

It’s important that we keep pressure on FDA and Congress throughout the regulatory process, particularly since thus far, the agency hasn’t expressed much interest in playing nice. For example, when the FDA issued its request for information supporting their yet-to-be-created list of bulk drug substances that may be compounded, the agency set a deadline of three months in which to submit formal comments. Although ANH-USA and its allies did the best they could, it was impossible to give FDA the information they requested in such a short timeframe. In fact, we estimated it would have taken over thirty months (15,000 hours; 1,875 business days), not three, to properly gather the data.

In what we believe was a direct reaction to such behavior, on May 23, the Senate Appropriations Committee criticized the FDA for ignoring doctors, patients, and compounding pharmacists by issuing proposed new regulations on compounding pharmacies without sufficiently consulting the stakeholders.

ANH-USA: Your Capitol Hill Watchdogs

ANH-USA is a nonpartisan grassroots consumer advocacy organization that protects the right of natural health practitioners to practice, and the right of consumers to choose the healthcare options they prefer.

Since 1992, ANH-USA has worked to shift the medical paradigm from an exclusive focus on surgery, drugs, and other conventional techniques to an integrative approach incorporating healthy foods, dietary supplements, and lifestyle changes. We believe this is the way to improve health and extend lives while returning the costs o healthcare to a sustainable level.

On both the state and federal levels ANH-USA acts as a government watchdog, files comments on proposed rulemakings, and educates the public, press, and other decision-makers. ANH-USA is the only grassroots advocacy organization working to protect compounding pharmacies by engaging directly with congressional decision-makers.

ANH has offices in the United Kingdom; Atlanta, GA; and the Washington, DC, metro area. It is the largest natural health-focused consumer group in the world.


To stay up to date on the compounding issue, as well as other issues that impact the integrative health community, subscribe to our weekly e-newsletter, The Pulse of Natural Health, at www.ANH-USA.org. The Pulse alerts grassroots activists to troubling laws and regulations, and provides opportunities for action.

 

Community Search
Sign In


Forgot your password?

Haven't registered yet?

Calendar

9/14/2017 » 9/17/2017
ACAM 2017 Annual Meeting

Latest News
Online Surveys