Print Page  |  Contact Us  |  Report Abuse  |  Sign In  |  Join ACAM
CAP Training - Follow Up Questions
Blog Home All Blogs
Search all posts for:   

 

View all (3) posts »

DMSA provoked heavy metal testing

Posted By Liz Pullman, Tuesday, June 21, 2016

Dear Colleagues,

I’m writing in hopes you can direct me as to how to proceed with a difficult case. I’ve attended the chelation coursework and passed the certification exam.

I requested Prior Authorization from Forward Health in Wisconsin for DMSA provoked heavy metal testing. The male patient I work with has worked in the auto repair trade and has had 3 major motor vehicle accidents with surgeries and bolts/plates/screws placed for bone fractures. He has chronic pain requiring opiates, and subsequent functional disability in the context of his history of physical injuries.  As he’s not able to afford to pay for chelation therapy, dependent on the lab finding, I would treat for one to three months with an oral herbal preparation. Our goal is to determine if that might improve his pain. It was determined that the heavy metal testing and treatment “did not meet the criterion of medical necessity to qualify for MA reimbursement”.  

I then filed a grievance with the legislators because it seems all that is being paid for is ER visits and narcotics. I tried to make the case of potential for reduced costs if treatment is effective.  I received a letter back from the State of WI Inspector General saying the over-the-counter herbals aren’t covered. Testing with DMSA provocation is controversial. That the Am. College of Medical Toxicology finds no benefit and it may be harmful to test. He cited UpToDate saying that chelation isn’t supported because there isn’t research to show morbidity and mortality reduction is associated. Their CMS Local Coverage Determination is quoted as medically necessary when the pt has history of likely exposure. They only test with whole blood. And as this pt only has severe, chronic pain, that that is NOT a symptom of heavy metal toxicity, so therefore, testing and treatment are not appropriate and would not be covered.

Do you know of any articles I can reference to Forward Health that explain why I need to do the testing and that it is a valuable test. Are there other arguments to make? Or am I wrong here? I have the articles on the TACT study and the upcoming TACT2 plans, but those speak to heart disease.

Thanks for your input! Sue

Sue Peck PhD, GNP-BC, APNP, FAAO, APT, CHTP/I
Integrative Nurse Practitioner 

Fellow American Academy of Ozone Therapy
Health Office Co. at Optima Health & Vitality
3321A Golf Rd.
Eau Claire, WI 54701
715-832-1953
pecksd@uwec.edu

This post has not been tagged.

Share |
Permalink | Comments (1)
 

Comments on this post...

W. A. Shrader, Jr. says...
Posted Wednesday, June 22, 2016
Sue,
I'm afraid your State is correct. Currently, it is the general official opinion that provocation with DMSA, etc. is still controversial, and ACAM needs to rethink teaching it as gospel until we have further study. Treatment with chelation for chronic pain, whatever the source, is also currently unproven . So I'm afraid you have to sit back and wait until further studies may show absolute value of both
Permalink to this Comment }

Community Search
Sign In


Forgot your password?

Haven't registered yet?

Calendar

9/14/2017 » 9/16/2017
ACAM 2017 Annual Meeting

Latest News